首页> 外文OA文献 >The effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to NaF varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on dental erosion in vitro
【2h】

The effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to NaF varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on dental erosion in vitro

机译:实验4%TiF(4)清漆与NaF清漆和4%TiF(4)溶液对牙体糜烂的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This in vitro study assessed the effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to commercial NaF and NaF/CaF(2) varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on enamel erosion. For this, 72 bovine enamel specimens were randomly allocated to the following treatments: NaF varnish (2.26% F), NaF/CaF(2) varnish (5.63% F), 4% TiF(4) varnish (2.45% F), F-free placebo varnish, 4% TiF(4) solution (2.45% F) and control (not treated). The varnishes were applied in a thin layer and removed after 6 h. The solution was applied to the enamel surface for 1 min. Then, the specimens were alternately de- and remineralized (6 times/day) in an artificial mouth for 5 days at 37 degrees C. Demineralization was performed with the beverage Sprite (1 min, 3 ml/min) and remineralization with artificial saliva (day: 59 min, 0.5 ml/min; during the night: 0.1 ml/min). The mean daily increment of erosion and the cumulative erosion data were tested using ANOVA and ANCOVA, respectively, followed by Tukey`s test (alpha = 0.05). The mean daily erosion increments and cumulative erosion (micrometers) were significantly less for the TiF(4) varnish (0.30 +/- 0.11/0.65 +/- 0.75) than for the NaF varnish (0.58 +/- 0.11/1.47 +/- 1.07) or the NaF/CaF(2) varnish (0.62 +/- 0.10/1.68 +/- 1.17), which in turn showed significantly less erosion than the placebo varnish (0.78 +/- 0.12/2.05 +/- 1.43), TiF(4) solution (0.86 +/- 0.11/2.05 +/- 1.49) and control (0.77 +/- 0.16/2.06 +/- 1.49). In conclusion, the TiF(4) varnish seems to be a promising treatment to reduce enamel loss under mild erosive conditions. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
机译:这项体外研究评估了与商用NaF和NaF / CaF(2)清漆以及4%TiF(4)解决方案相比,实验用4%TiF(4)清漆对牙釉质侵蚀的影响。为此,将72个牛牙釉质标本随机分配到以下处理中:NaF清漆(2.26%F),NaF / CaF(2)清漆(5.63%F),4%TiF(4)清漆(2.45%F),F -不含安慰剂的清漆,4%TiF(4)溶液(2.45%F)和对照(未处理)。将清漆涂成薄层,并在6小时后去除。将该溶液施涂在搪瓷表面1分钟。然后,将样品在37摄氏度的人工口中交替进行脱矿质和矿化(6次/天)5天。用饮料Sprite进行脱矿质(1分钟,3毫升/分钟),并用人工唾液进行矿化(一天:59分钟,0.5毫升/分钟;夜间:0.1毫升/分钟)。使用ANOVA和ANCOVA分别测试平均每日侵蚀增量和累积侵蚀数据,然后进行Tukey检验(alpha = 0.05)。 TiF(4)清漆(0.30 +/- 0.11 / 0.65 +/- 0.75)的平均每日腐蚀增量和累积腐蚀量(微米)明显小于NaF清漆(0.58 +/- 0.11 / 1.47 +/-) 1.07)或NaF / CaF(2)清漆(0.62 +/- 0.10 / 1.68 +/- 1.17),与安慰剂清漆(0.78 +/- 0.12 / 2.05 +/- 1.43)相比,其腐蚀显着降低, TiF(4)溶液(0.86 +/- 0.11 / 2.05 +/- 1.49)和对照(0.77 +/- 0.16 / 2.06 +/- 1.49)。总之,TiF(4)清漆似乎是减少在轻度腐蚀条件下减少瓷釉损失的有前途的方法。版权所有(C)2008 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号